Comments on: Iceweasel 3.6 approching http://glandium.org/blog/?p=945 glandium.org Sun, 05 Sep 2010 12:27:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Alex http://glandium.org/blog/?p=945&cpage=1#comment-17180 Alex Fri, 26 Mar 2010 19:03:45 +0000 http://glandium.org/blog/?p=945#comment-17180 Is there a 3.6.2 build? Is there a 3.6.2 build?

]]> By: Vinz http://glandium.org/blog/?p=945&cpage=1#comment-17052 Vinz Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:52:03 +0000 http://glandium.org/blog/?p=945#comment-17052 Had some issues with iceweasel 3.5.8 (in testing) so upgraded to these i386 packages. Works like a dream! Had some issues with iceweasel 3.5.8 (in testing) so upgraded to these i386 packages. Works like a dream!

]]> By: Rollopack http://glandium.org/blog/?p=945&cpage=1#comment-17007 Rollopack Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:13:25 +0000 http://glandium.org/blog/?p=945#comment-17007 Thanks for the package, works great on Debian Sid 64 Thanks for the package, works great on Debian Sid 64

]]> By: Iceweasel 3.6 pre-experimental « De pingüinos y otras aves http://glandium.org/blog/?p=945&cpage=1#comment-16979 Iceweasel 3.6 pre-experimental « De pingüinos y otras aves Tue, 09 Mar 2010 10:17:47 +0000 http://glandium.org/blog/?p=945#comment-16979 [...] paquetes en cuestión los encontramos aquí, tanto para 32 como para 64 bits. Deberemos seguir el siguiente orden en la instalación de los [...] [...] paquetes en cuestión los encontramos aquí, tanto para 32 como para 64 bits. Deberemos seguir el siguiente orden en la instalación de los [...]

]]> By: Iceweasel 3.6 - Foros Softonic http://glandium.org/blog/?p=945&cpage=1#comment-16978 Iceweasel 3.6 - Foros Softonic Tue, 09 Mar 2010 09:55:03 +0000 http://glandium.org/blog/?p=945#comment-16978 [...] [...] [...] [...]

]]> By: glandium http://glandium.org/blog/?p=945&cpage=1#comment-16970 glandium Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:04:47 +0000 http://glandium.org/blog/?p=945#comment-16970 arno: this problem is notified when you start iceweasel 3.6 ;) It is already fixed in my local branch. frankie: This may be an issue with symbolic links, that has been introduced upstream somewhen during gecko 1.9.2 development. arno: this problem is notified when you start iceweasel 3.6 ;)
It is already fixed in my local branch.

frankie: This may be an issue with symbolic links, that has been introduced upstream somewhen during gecko 1.9.2 development.

]]> By: arno http://glandium.org/blog/?p=945&cpage=1#comment-16969 arno Mon, 08 Mar 2010 09:53:21 +0000 http://glandium.org/blog/?p=945#comment-16969 Hi, this soon available xulrunner-1.9.2 package is great news \o/ I tried the package, and I noticed a small bug when launching a xulrunner application with it: I get following exception in javascript console: Error: [Exception... "Component returned failure code: 0x80520001 (NS_ERROR_FILE_UNRECOGNIZED_PATH) [nsILocalFile.initWithPath]" nsresult: "0x80520001 (NS_ERROR_FILE_UNRECOGNIZED_PATH)" location: "JS frame :: file:///usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2/distribution/bundles/debian/components/debUpdateNotifier.js :: monitoredList :: line 97" data: no] Source File: file:///usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2/distribution/bundles/debian/components/debUpdateNotifier.js Line: 97 in: var plugins = phs.getPluginTags({ }); ... plugins[i].filename the filename property is just the basename; that's why plugin.initWithPath fails If I comment those lines, application and extensions directory are correctly monitored. Except that, I didn't notice any other glitch Hi, this soon available xulrunner-1.9.2 package is great news \o/

I tried the package, and I noticed a small bug when launching a xulrunner application with it: I get following exception in javascript console:

Error: [Exception... "Component returned failure code: 0x80520001 (NS_ERROR_FILE_UNRECOGNIZED_PATH) [nsILocalFile.initWithPath]” nsresult: “0×80520001 (NS_ERROR_FILE_UNRECOGNIZED_PATH)” location: “JS frame :: file:///usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2/distribution/bundles/debian/components/debUpdateNotifier.js :: monitoredList :: line 97″ data: no]
Source File: file:///usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2/distribution/bundles/debian/components/debUpdateNotifier.js
Line: 97

in:
var plugins = phs.getPluginTags({ });
…
plugins[i].filename

the filename property is just the basename; that’s why plugin.initWithPath fails

If I comment those lines, application and extensions directory are correctly monitored.

Except that, I didn’t notice any other glitch

]]> By: Frankie http://glandium.org/blog/?p=945&cpage=1#comment-16963 Frankie Sun, 07 Mar 2010 23:10:56 +0000 http://glandium.org/blog/?p=945#comment-16963 Hi, I can't start iceweasel 3.6 for the second time (it starts only the first time after installation) with the extension downthemall installed from debian repository (package iceweasel-downthemall), same version of that present in the mozilla website that supports 3.6 This happens in both i386 and amd64. Not a big problem, is just to let you know.. Thank for your work! Hi,
I can’t start iceweasel 3.6 for the second time (it starts only the first time after installation) with the extension downthemall installed from debian repository (package iceweasel-downthemall), same version of that present in the mozilla website that supports 3.6
This happens in both i386 and amd64.
Not a big problem, is just to let you know..
Thank for your work!

]]> By: shiba87 http://glandium.org/blog/?p=945&cpage=1#comment-16961 shiba87 Sun, 07 Mar 2010 15:55:44 +0000 http://glandium.org/blog/?p=945#comment-16961 Thank you, I have been waiting for iceweasel 3.6, and it's better than was thinking. Thank you, I have been waiting for iceweasel 3.6, and it’s better than was thinking.

]]> By: netanel_h http://glandium.org/blog/?p=945&cpage=1#comment-16957 netanel_h Sun, 07 Mar 2010 09:56:35 +0000 http://glandium.org/blog/?p=945#comment-16957 Thank you very much! I run it now, and although it's only pre-experimental it looks very stable on i386, and much faster. Thank you very much! I run it now, and although it’s only pre-experimental it looks very stable on i386, and much faster.

]]>