http://glandium.org/blog/?p=161 glandium.org Sun, 05 Sep 2010 12:27:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 http://glandium.org/blog/?p=161&cpage=1#comment-9195 MJ Ray Sat, 08 Sep 2007 19:13:58 +0000 http://web.glandium.org/blog/?p=161#comment-9195 Who cares about Javascript performance? Doesn't anyone who cares about power consumption have javascript disabled, either directly or through add-ons like NoScript? Who cares about Javascript performance? Doesn’t anyone who cares about power consumption have javascript disabled, either directly or through add-ons like NoScript?

]]> http://glandium.org/blog/?p=161&cpage=1#comment-9189 nixternal » RE: Javascript performance in browsers Fri, 07 Sep 2007 20:54:33 +0000 http://web.glandium.org/blog/?p=161#comment-9189 [...] This post is just a quickie in response to Mike Hommey’s recent blog post titled “Javascript performance in browsers“. His post was in response to a Javascript Speed Test ran by CelticKane.com. So far, they have listed all of the browsers that I don’t use. So I decided to test my preferred browser, Konqueror, with this speed test. And without further ado, here are the results: [...] [...] This post is just a quickie in response to Mike Hommey’s recent blog post titled “Javascript performance in browsers“. His post was in response to a Javascript Speed Test ran by CelticKane.com. So far, they have listed all of the browsers that I don’t use. So I decided to test my preferred browser, Konqueror, with this speed test. And without further ado, here are the results: [...]

]]>