<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trademark vs Copyright</title>
	<atom:link href="http://glandium.org/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://glandium.org/blog/?p=104</link>
	<description>glandium.org</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 12:27:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: KDS</title>
		<link>http://glandium.org/blog/?p=104&#038;cpage=1#comment-8184</link>
		<dc:creator>KDS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 03:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.glandium.org/blog/?p=104#comment-8184</guid>
		<description>Mike, can you plot the number of responses for each post on this blog? I think there will be large spikes for those related to firefox branding stuff ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, can you plot the number of responses for each post on this blog? I think there will be large spikes for those related to firefox branding stuff ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://glandium.org/blog/?p=104&#038;cpage=1#comment-8183</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Cunningham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 11:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.glandium.org/blog/?p=104#comment-8183</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Would the disappearance of most Universe packages help?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

As a number of ex-DDs (and basically all potential NMs these days) have figured out, there&#039;s nothing stopping people from packaging software for Universe themselves, directly, instead of trying to work with an intermediary upstream which spends 60% of its time publicly annoying people.

I&#039;m amazed nobody on planet debian has yet publicly decried some random build / legal / community issue relating to Sun&#039;s code drop. After the JRE was officially packaged it was all of ten minutes before people were fighting tooth and nail to reject it.

 - Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Would the disappearance of most Universe packages help?</p></blockquote>
<p>As a number of ex-DDs (and basically all potential NMs these days) have figured out, there&#8217;s nothing stopping people from packaging software for Universe themselves, directly, instead of trying to work with an intermediary upstream which spends 60% of its time publicly annoying people.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m amazed nobody on planet debian has yet publicly decried some random build / legal / community issue relating to Sun&#8217;s code drop. After the JRE was officially packaged it was all of ten minutes before people were fighting tooth and nail to reject it.</p>
<p> &#8211; Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aperry</title>
		<link>http://glandium.org/blog/?p=104&#038;cpage=1#comment-8182</link>
		<dc:creator>aperry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 08:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.glandium.org/blog/?p=104#comment-8182</guid>
		<description>Chris Cunningham: could you share your wisdom and explain how the hell the death of Debian that you so realistically predict would benefit Ubuntu ? Would the disappearance of most Universe packages help ? Would it help if less people were working on Main packages that get included in Ubuntu every so often ? If this is really the case, Ubuntu may just stop using Debian packages. It&#039;s a pity there are so many Ubuntu users like you, I believe developers are a lot wiser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Cunningham: could you share your wisdom and explain how the hell the death of Debian that you so realistically predict would benefit Ubuntu ? Would the disappearance of most Universe packages help ? Would it help if less people were working on Main packages that get included in Ubuntu every so often ? If this is really the case, Ubuntu may just stop using Debian packages. It&#8217;s a pity there are so many Ubuntu users like you, I believe developers are a lot wiser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Np237</title>
		<link>http://glandium.org/blog/?p=104&#038;cpage=1#comment-8181</link>
		<dc:creator>Np237</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 07:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.glandium.org/blog/?p=104#comment-8181</guid>
		<description>Chris, those who don&#039;t care of software being free are, well, free to use a non-free operating system, such as Ubuntu or Microsoft Windows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, those who don&#8217;t care of software being free are, well, free to use a non-free operating system, such as Ubuntu or Microsoft Windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crf</title>
		<link>http://glandium.org/blog/?p=104&#038;cpage=1#comment-8180</link>
		<dc:creator>crf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 03:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.glandium.org/blog/?p=104#comment-8180</guid>
		<description>I doubt you could give the &quot;Duke&quot; logo away, so what does it matter what licence it&#039;s under. And wtf is it (a gnome? an extracted molar? a marshmallow?)
Debian Swirly, Firefox, Coffee Cup: those are obviously (to me) good logos, and worth protecting. 
Duke: it barely rates a mention on wikipedia, with no explanation of what it is. Compare to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Mozilla_Firefox
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clippy

I read something about Duke here from &#039;99 --&gt; http://java.sun.com/features/1999/05/duke.html
Apparently, he presaged Clippy. WOW! And he had great fun protecting his trademark! Riot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt you could give the &#8220;Duke&#8221; logo away, so what does it matter what licence it&#8217;s under. And wtf is it (a gnome? an extracted molar? a marshmallow?)<br />
Debian Swirly, Firefox, Coffee Cup: those are obviously (to me) good logos, and worth protecting.<br />
Duke: it barely rates a mention on wikipedia, with no explanation of what it is. Compare to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Mozilla_Firefox" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Mozilla_Firefox</a><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clippy" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clippy</a></p>
<p>I read something about Duke here from &#8217;99 &#8211;&gt; <a href="http://java.sun.com/features/1999/05/duke.html" rel="nofollow">http://java.sun.com/features/1999/05/duke.html</a><br />
Apparently, he presaged Clippy. WOW! And he had great fun protecting his trademark! Riot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://glandium.org/blog/?p=104&#038;cpage=1#comment-8178</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Cunningham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 00:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.glandium.org/blog/?p=104#comment-8178</guid>
		<description>Rubbish. It&#039;s literally exactly the same situation. The mascot matters not one jot. One cannot call one&#039;s Java runtime a &quot;java runtime&quot; without Sun&#039;s approval. The mascot matters not.

But hell, keep it up. Debian is about a year from utter obsolescence at this point thanks to obnoxious DDs, so anything that hastens this will benefit those who have settled on Ubuntu already (such as, y&#039;know, Sun).

 - Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rubbish. It&#8217;s literally exactly the same situation. The mascot matters not one jot. One cannot call one&#8217;s Java runtime a &#8220;java runtime&#8221; without Sun&#8217;s approval. The mascot matters not.</p>
<p>But hell, keep it up. Debian is about a year from utter obsolescence at this point thanks to obnoxious DDs, so anything that hastens this will benefit those who have settled on Ubuntu already (such as, y&#8217;know, Sun).</p>
<p> &#8211; Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Weinehall</title>
		<link>http://glandium.org/blog/?p=104&#038;cpage=1#comment-8177</link>
		<dc:creator>David Weinehall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 23:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.glandium.org/blog/?p=104#comment-8177</guid>
		<description>Not only that, but Duke is way cooler than the planet-humper...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only that, but Duke is way cooler than the planet-humper&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tuukka</title>
		<link>http://glandium.org/blog/?p=104&#038;cpage=1#comment-8176</link>
		<dc:creator>tuukka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 22:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.glandium.org/blog/?p=104#comment-8176</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Mozilla can take a lesson from the open-sourcing of the Java Coffee Cup Logo, yeah.

Oh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Mozilla can take a lesson from the open-sourcing of the Java Coffee Cup Logo, yeah.</p>
<p>Oh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
